<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jonathan Murray &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2</link>
	<description>News, comment, attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First Lunar Eclipse on Winter Solstice in how many years?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/12/21/first-lunar-eclipse-on-winter-solstice-in-how-many-years/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/12/21/first-lunar-eclipse-on-winter-solstice-in-how-many-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some things just strike me as funny: Winter Solstice + Lunar Eclipse—First in 372 Years First lunar eclipse on Winter Solstice in 456 years Lunar Eclipse Tonight + Winter Solstice—First in 632 Years 372 456 632 What year is this again? Oh yeah, I was out there.  Once again wishing I had a better camera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some things just strike me as funny:</p>
<p><a href="news.nationalgeographic.com/.../101220-lunar-eclipse-winter-solstice-2010-science-shortest-day-first/" target="_blank">Winter Solstice + Lunar Eclipse—First in 372 Years</a></p>
<p><a href="www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=39651" target="_blank">First lunar eclipse on Winter Solstice in 456 years</a></p>
<p><a href="www.firetown.com/.../lunar-eclipse-tonight-winter-solstice—first-in-632-years/" target="_blank">Lunar Eclipse Tonight + Winter Solstice—First in 632 Years</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=eclipse+solstice+372" target="_blank">372</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=eclipse+solstice+456" target="_blank">456</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=eclipse+solstice+632" target="_blank">632</a></p>
<p>What year is this again?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I was out there.  Once again wishing I had a better camera for this sort of thing.  Too bad it was too damned cold to get out the telescope and take a close look, but there are plenty of <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/photogalleries/101221-lunar-eclipse-2010-pictures-winter-solstice-december-20-nasa-space-science-pictures/" target="_blank">pictures available from the professionals</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/12/21/first-lunar-eclipse-on-winter-solstice-in-how-many-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ever wonder how the machines are supposed to turn us into batteries?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/05/21/ever-wonder-how-the-machines-are-supposed-to-turn-us-into-batteries/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/05/21/ever-wonder-how-the-machines-are-supposed-to-turn-us-into-batteries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, we&#8217;ll do it for them&#8230; Power from Glucose Scientists have implanted the first functional glucose biofuel cell in a living animal. Unlike batteries that supply power to implants, a power-generating device may not have to be surgically removed and replaced, because glucose is a potentially limitless source of energy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As expected, we&#8217;ll do it for them&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/25341/?">Power from Glucose</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Scientists have implanted the first functional glucose biofuel cell in a  living animal. Unlike batteries that supply power to implants, a  power-generating device may not have to be surgically removed and  replaced, because glucose is a potentially limitless source of energy.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/05/21/ever-wonder-how-the-machines-are-supposed-to-turn-us-into-batteries/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/05/21/ever-wonder-how-the-machines-are-supposed-to-turn-us-into-batteries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life:  More GW propaganda?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/04/08/life-more-gw-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/04/08/life-more-gw-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ClimateChange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visually interesting, pretty damned amazing series, actually. I don&#8217;t even mind listening to Oprah&#8217;s mildly annoying voice (more suited to bedtime stories than something you&#8217;d want to stay awake for). At least until they got to the part about polar bears, and had to throw in the usual &#8220;swimming for their life&#8221;, &#8220;melting ice&#8221; crap. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visually interesting, pretty damned amazing series, actually.  I don&#8217;t even mind listening to Oprah&#8217;s mildly annoying voice (more suited to bedtime stories than something you&#8217;d want to stay awake for).  At least until they got to the part about polar bears, and had to throw in the usual &#8220;swimming for their life&#8221;, &#8220;melting ice&#8221; crap.  Reminded me that I wanted to read up on something I heard earlier:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-06/arctic-sea-ice-melting-season-posts-latest-start-on-record.html">Arctic Sea Ice Melting Season Posts Latest Start on Record</a></p>
<blockquote><p>April 6 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The extent of sea ice over the Arctic Ocean grew until the last day of March, the latest the annual melting season has begun in 31 years of satellite records, the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center said.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, this article also goes on to say the ice is still &#8220;well outside the range of natural variability,&#8221; but given the shifts in all data over the last couple of years, haven&#8217;t we seen enough to think maybe, just <em>maybe</em>, this is all part of a larger cycle?  Or must we continue to be so damned arrogant as to believe the world revolves around us?  (By &#8220;we&#8221;, I mean all of you arrogant assholes who insist every problem in the world is caused by humanity.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/04/08/life-more-gw-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garbage in&#8230; Global warming out</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/02/14/garbage-in-global-warming-out/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/02/14/garbage-in-global-warming-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ClimateChange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Phil Jones, the guy who invented the centerpiece of AlGore&#8217;s little PowerPoint presentation, has no fracking clue what happened to the records he based the climate scare on.  He&#8217;s a (now) self-admitted disorganized piss-poor record keeper. Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Phil Jones, the guy who invented the centerpiece of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth" target="_blank">AlGore&#8217;s little PowerPoint presentation</a>, has no fracking clue what happened to the records he based the climate scare on.  He&#8217;s a (now) self-admitted disorganized piss-poor record keeper.</p>
<blockquote><p>Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the  observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that  his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping  is ‘not as good as it should be’.</p>
<p>The data is crucial to the  famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support  the theory.</p></blockquote>
<p>And to top it off, all that &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704779704574552533758682774.html" target="_blank">settled science</a>&#8221; now isn&#8217;t&#8230; settled, nor apparently even science.</p>
<blockquote><p>Professor Jones departed from this consensus when he said: ‘There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia.</p>
<p>‘For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.</p>
<p>‘Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th Century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm than today, then the current warmth would be unprecedented.’</p>
<p>Sceptics said this was the first time a senior scientist working with the IPCC had admitted to the possibility that the Medieval Warming Period could have been global, and therefore the world could have been hotter then than now.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html">Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online</a>.</p>
<p>NOW there&#8217;s debate.  Not when the theory was proposed.  Not when the theory was being presented to the world.  Not when stick-up-the-ass Algore was embezzling billions in &#8220;carbon credits&#8221;.  No, &#8220;the science was settled&#8221; until these <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=f6fa4aca-61b4-4824-adb4-78eb8fa9081a" target="_blank">phony eco-fanatics were caught cheating on the numbers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2010/02/14/garbage-in-global-warming-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science at work</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/07/26/science-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/07/26/science-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t get it.  If so many climate scientists have done so much research that &#8220;the debate is over&#8221;, then why do we still get treated to such emotional bullshit as this? &#8220;This is probably just a perception, but I just have the feeling that the glaciers are melting, the snow capping the mountains is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  If so many climate scientists have done so much research that &#8220;the debate is over&#8221;, then why do we still get treated to such emotional bullshit as this?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSB19689" target="_blank">&#8220;This is probably just a perception, but I just have the feeling that the glaciers are melting, the snow capping the mountains is less than it was 12 years ago when I saw it last time,&#8221; Thrisk said. &#8220;That saddens me a little bit.&#8221;</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Complete nonsense.  Either the glaciers are melting, or they&#8217;re not.  Reporting that an astronaut &#8220;feels&#8221; like they&#8217;re smaller from when he saw them TWELVE YEARS AGO&#8230; is not reporting.  Journalism standards fall lower and lower every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/07/26/science-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Jindal</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/04/06/not-jindal/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/04/06/not-jindal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Party needs a conservative with strong moral values and a voice people will listen to. We don&#8217;t need a conservative with strong moral values and a penchant for mythological tales of creation. Especially not one that thinks those same tales need to be taught to children in school science classes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party needs a conservative with strong moral values and a voice people will listen to.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need a conservative with strong moral values and a penchant for mythological tales of creation.</p>
<p>Especially not one that thinks those same tales need to be <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=bobby+jindal+creationism">taught to children in school science classes</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/04/06/not-jindal/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/04/06/not-jindal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fever Pitch Fanatacism</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/01/19/fever-pitch-fanatacism/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/01/19/fever-pitch-fanatacism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President &#8216;has four years to save Earth&#8217; Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding, widespread species loss and major disruptions of weather patterns in the near future. &#8220;We cannot afford to put off change any longer,&#8221; said Hansen. &#8220;We have to get on a new path within this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/18/jim-hansen-obama" target="_blank">President &#8216;has four years to save Earth&#8217;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding, widespread species loss and major disruptions of weather patterns in the near future. &#8220;We cannot afford to put off change any longer,&#8221; said Hansen. &#8220;We have to get on a new path within this new administration. We have only four years left for Obama to set an example to the rest of the world. America must take the lead.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, this is the guy apparently responsible for creating statistics to support his fanaticism.  (<a href="http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.chem/2007-08/msg00086.html" target="_blank">NASA Chief James E. Hansen cooked the books on Global Warming)</a></p>
<p>Headlines that don&#8217;t evoke images of doom and gloom don&#8217;t sell papers, though.  Perhaps that &#8220;fairness doctrine&#8221; they keep yelling for on radio should apply to the print media as well?  Here&#8217;s another, equally qualified opinion:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/01/12/22506/" target="_blank">Professor denies global warming theory</a></p>
<blockquote><p>“This is George Orwell. This is the ‘Germans are the master race. The Jews are the scum of the earth.’ It’s that kind of propaganda,” Happer, the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, said in an interview. “Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Every time you exhale, you exhale air that has 4 percent carbon dioxide. To say that that’s a pollutant just boggles my mind. What used to be science has turned into a cult.”</p>
<p>Happer served as director of the Office of Energy Research in the U.S. Department of Energy under President George H.W. Bush and was subsequently fired by Vice President Al Gore, reportedly for his refusal to support Gore’s views on climate change. He asked last month to be added to a list of global warming dissenters in a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee report. The list includes more than 650 experts who challenge the belief that human activity is contributing to global warming</p></blockquote>
<p>But the dissenting opinions don&#8217;t get the headlines &#8211; the religion of global warming (oops&#8230; &#8220;climate change&#8221;) has banished such talk to the side channels.</p>
<p>We may never know the truth, but I&#8217;m sure that regardless the outcome (freezing cold, burning heat, drowning in deep water, dried out husks&#8230;) someone with a gift for eloquent, convincing speech will find a way to use that event to control some portion of humanity.  After all, most of us are idiot followers looking for someone else to lead.  Fortunately for the rest of you, there are enough cynics like me in the world who can tell you just how stupid you&#8217;re being.  All you have to do is listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2009/01/19/fever-pitch-fanatacism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Evil Just Wrong</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/11/17/not-evil-just-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/11/17/not-evil-just-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Algore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their title, not mine&#8230; personally, I think Al Gore is at least a bit evil as well as a lot wrong. I can&#8217;t wait for the DVD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their title, not mine&#8230; personally, I think Al Gore is at least a bit evil as well as a lot wrong.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sHMOEVRysWE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sHMOEVRysWE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/11/17/not-evil-just-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Chinese Prognostication</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/09/25/amazing-chinese-prognostication/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/09/25/amazing-chinese-prognostication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These guys are amazing! China space mission article hits Web before launch &#8211; Yahoo! News BEIJING &#8211; A news story describing a successful launch of China&#8217;s long-awaited space mission and including detailed dialogue between astronauts launched on the Internet Thursday, hours before the rocket had even left the ground. &#8230; The arcticle, dated two days [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys are amazing!</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080925/ap_on_re_as/as_china_space_article_1">China space mission article hits Web before launch &#8211; Yahoo! News</a></p>
<blockquote><p>BEIJING &#8211; A news story describing a successful launch of China&#8217;s long-awaited space mission and including detailed dialogue between astronauts launched on the Internet Thursday, hours before the rocket had even left the ground.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The arcticle, dated two days from now on Sept. 27, vividly described the rocket in flight, complete with a sharply detailed dialogue between the three astronauts.</p>
<p>Excerpts are below:</p>
<p>&#8220;After this order, signal lights all were switched on, various data show up on rows of screens, hundreds of technicians staring at the screens, without missing any slightest changes &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;One minute to go!&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;Changjiang No.1 found the target!&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The firm voice of the controller broke the silence of the whole ship. Now, the target is captured 12 seconds ahead of the predicted time &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow&#8230; they even predicted being 12 seconds ahead of their previous predictions!  Now THAT&#8217;S incredible.  I wonder if they&#8217;re filming on the same soundstage we used to simulate the lunar landings!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/09/25/amazing-chinese-prognostication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Never discuss religion or politics in polite company&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/07/28/never-discuss-religion-or-politics-in-polite-company/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/07/28/never-discuss-religion-or-politics-in-polite-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/?p=1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But since I know you all so well, and I don&#8217;t remember any of you accusing me of being polite&#8230;  I present more random thoughts on religion. (this article was written in my religion wiki, some formatting may not carry through &#8211; feel free to read the original, currently at the bottom of the &#8220;general&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But since I know you all so well, and I don&#8217;t remember any of you accusing me of being polite&#8230;  I present more random thoughts on religion.</p>
<p>(this article was written in my <a href="http://www.jonathanmurray.com/DokuWiki/doku.php?id=religion" target="_self">religion wiki</a>, some formatting may not carry through &#8211; feel free to read the original, currently at the bottom of the &#8220;general&#8221; page if this turns out looking like some obscure variation of cuneiform.)</p>
<div class="level2">
<p>These ideas came to me today while having a discussion<sup>1</sup> on religion in general with a devout, (recent?) convert to Christianity. I struggled to hold them in my head until I could get them into words &#8211; too often I have amazingly lucid thoughts that never make it into any sort of permanent form; I need to get better at this.</p>
</div>
<h5><a id="the-wave" name="the-wave">The wave</a></h5>
<div class="level5">
<p>In trying to determine an analogy for “god/God”, I came upon the idea that “god” is a wave<sup>2</sup>, perhaps a harmonic, that we can feel. This wave pushes us through life on the path of “right”, and following that path, not fighting the wave, feels good/right. This idea was countered by the axiom that god gave us a conscience, which helps us to know right from wrong. This does not contradict my idea, just offers another demonstration of how humans have given a name to a concept.</p>
<p>My thought here is that the concept of god is another attempt to give a name to what we don’t understand; in this case, the wave.</p>
<p>I recognize the human need to quantify everything we encounter &#8211; thus, as I’ve stated before, the need for god to exist. Not God, in fact, but the concept of god as a name given to that tidal force of life that we all feel in various ways. Of course, this force can be misinterpreted just as easily as it can be accepted as a guiding force. The same human nature that drives some to seek comfort in staying on the path can drive others to fight it &#8211; thus not all visions of “god” are the same, and not all interpretations of the way to follow the path are the same.</p>
<p>The basic premise of the wave, that life must continue, thrive, and expand, is what brings people together to form communities, help each other, and ensure the continuance of their own. Unfortunately, these ideas, these driving forces, can also be used as justification to kill. When the driving force says “live, grow, expand”, the individual can come to believe that means them or their group alone. This is how religions grow to wage war on each other.</p>
<p>We fail as a species when we fail to understand we’re all hearing the same music; all feeling the same wave. The answer is not the abolition of religion, the answer is for all religions to understand they’re searching for the same thing.</p>
<p>To build on the ‘wave’ concept, and to offer religion a hand up, I could easily believe in the ability of some humans to be “sensitive” to the wave. These could be (some) modern day religious figures who do good work in the name of their faith, and they could be those who have gone before, framing the ideas that became modern day religions. Abraham, Buddha, Jesus, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, maybe even Lafayette Ronald Hubbard &#8211; all have vast followings who may feel the wave the same way (or at least, a similar way) as these men did. When you find someone who can describe that ever-present force of life the way you feel it, an explanation for the unexplainable that just seems to “makes sense”, perhaps that’s the driving force that creates what we know as religion. Maybe it’s enough to discover that others are hearing music, too; the actual notes don’t matter.</p>
<p>I think that may also be exactly the problem.</p>
<p>The catchy part about the concept of the wave is that, like faith itself, it cannot be quantified. Attempts to do so require compromise in order to put it into words. Parables are useful, as they show examples without trying to give a precise picture (which would well explain why the Bible is largely made up of parables). When individuals attempt to codify their vision of the wave, the meaning is compromised. When individuals determine that others should see/feel/experience the wave as they do, religion is created and sometimes, miscreated.</p>
<p>In the aforementioned conversation, I stated “you can’t put handles on the wave”; meaning that once you try to stop the wave to get a firm picture, you’re no longer riding the wave, and your perspective is skewed. Religion attempts to attach handles. The concepts may be right, but they’re always at least a little off, since you can’t fully describe a thing that never stops with words that have finite meaning.</p>
<p><sup>1</sup>The conversation started well, and didn’t end badly, but as usual when I get on a thought-roll, I did tend to hold the floor more than my share (sorry, Scott). I always find it disappointing when one of these conversations rolls against the “faith” line of reasoning, though. If the only proof of your faith is the book that describes your faith, why not take a mental leap into the possibility that there is a larger picture? I’m not saying religion (in general) is wrong, just that it may be merely a human attempt at quantifying the unquantifiable. To say humankind has all the answers, and they’re right here in this here book&#8230; is pretty damned arrogant. ‘Nuff said.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>after saying it over and over in my head, “wave” may be the wrong word here &#8211; “tide” might be more appropriate. I first used “the force”, but of course that made the whole concept go awry in a Star Wars themed way. If I rewrite this article into something more permanent, I’ll have to decide on a term that better demonstrates the intent. Of course, the fact that I am having a hard time giving it a name helps to illustrate my point&#8230; so perhaps I won’t change it after all.</p>
</div>
<p><!-- no cachefile used, but created --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathanmurray.com/wp2/2008/07/28/never-discuss-religion-or-politics-in-polite-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

